December 12, 2019
Your Neighbors. Your News.

My Account

To make updates to your Zip06 account or requets changes to your newspaper delivery, please choose an option below.

Welcome to!

If you have an account, please login! If you don't have an account, you can create one.



A Zip06 account will allow you to post to the online calendar, contribute to News From You, and interact with the Zip06 community. It's free to sign-up!

Click here to get started!

Register for Zip06

We're happy you've decided to join the Zip06 community. Please fill out this short registration form to begin sharing content with your neighbors.

You must enter your first name.
You must enter your last name.
You must enter a username
You must enter a valid email address
Show password
You must enter a valid zip code

Submit to Zip06

Forget Your Password?

We can help! Enter the email address registered to your account below to have your password emailed to you.

Submit an Announcement

Shared Skepticism

Published July 17, 2019

Email This Story

Fill out the form below to email this story to a friend


I have advocated for regional governance and regional economic development in various capacities for 30 years, so it is with an intense sense of irony that I find myself sharing Selectman Charles Havrda’s skepticism regarding the five shoreline town economic development consortium recently proposed to the Guilford Board of Selectmen at the June 17 meeting, though probably for different reasons. It is impossible to adequately list the flaws in the proposed plan in the 300 words that the Courier will allow me, so here are some highlights.

First, a budget of $15- to $25,000 for a planning project including consulting for a five-town scope will buy little more than a glossy report with platitudes based on off-the-shelf statistics and the requisite photos, graphs, and maps for filler, but little insight or actionable strategy. We don’t need another.

Second, while there are clearly intersects of possible shared interest among the five towns of Guilford, Madison, North Branford, Branford, and Durham (I can think of at least three), no one of them could be effectively explored with the proposed budget and a one-year time horizon.

Third, a successful economic development strategy, particularly in as challenging area as the shoreline, is a long term affair, and the process and budget should be appropriately reflective of that reality before we rush to spend the first dollar.

In my opinion, this proposal is throwing money at the wall and hoping something sticks. We can and should do better.

Sidney F. Gale