This is a printer-friendly version of an article from Zip06.com.

09/25/2018 02:00 PM

SRR v. Clinton PZC Action Set for December


A pre-trial conference for the lawsuit filed by Old Post Realty, the developer behind the proposed Shoreline Rail and Recycling (SRR) facility, against the town Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) and has been set for Tuesday, Dec. 11 in Middletown Superior Court.

Old Post Realty filed its complaint in August, soon after a July 30 PZC meeting at which the commission passed a zoning amendment that prohibits “Commercial or industrial solid waste, construction, or demolition debris disposal, recycling, material transfer, or outdoor storage of materials not associated with a retail or contractor business.” The zones affected by the amendment include the I-2 zone overlaying the former Unilever warehouse site where SRR wanted to build.

In the complaint, Old Post Realty alleges that the PZC engaged in spot zoning, and that the amendment runs in contradiction to the town’s Plan of Conservation and Development, among other complaints.

At the July 30 PZC hearing, Thomas Cronan, the lawyer representing SRR, questioned the PZC about the amendment. Cronan submitted a letter to be read into the record that contained several questions to the PZC, including when the commission came up with the proposed change, if any members of the commission had contact with members of the Board of Selectmen, and other questions. The PZC declined to answer the questions at the time.

At the July 30 meeting, PZC Chairman Michael Rossi said earlier in the spring he asked John Guszkowski, the town’s consultant planner, to draft the zoning changes because he felt the use category wasn’t defined in the current regulations.

In spring 2018, the application by SRR to build a waste recycling plant drew intense public opposition. The proposed facility would have been 94,500 square feet at 30 Old Post Road off of Route 145. According to George Andrews of Louriero Engineering Associates, a company that had represented SRR in front of the Inland Wetlands Commission (IWC), the proposed facility would have been for storing waste composed of “construction and demolition debris.”

SRR decided to withdraw its application in May, after several member of the IWC indicated they were leaning toward voting “No” on the application at the commission’s next meeting. In June, SRR submitted a new application before the IWC, only to once again withdraw the application in early August, after the PZC passed the zoning amendment. At three public hearings on the proposal in the spring, no member of the public spoke in favor of the application.