August 9, 2020
Your Neighbors. Your News.

My Account

To make updates to your Zip06 account or requets changes to your newspaper delivery, please choose an option below.

Welcome to!

If you have an account, please login! If you don't have an account, you can create one.



A Zip06 account will allow you to post to the online calendar, contribute to News From You, and interact with the Zip06 community. It's free to sign-up!

Click here to get started!

Register for Zip06

We're happy you've decided to join the Zip06 community. Please fill out this short registration form to begin sharing content with your neighbors.

You must enter your first name.
You must enter your last name.
You must enter a username
You must enter a valid email address
Show password
You must enter a valid zip code

Submit to Zip06

Forget Your Password?

We can help! Enter the email address registered to your account below to have your password emailed to you.

Submit an Announcement

Replica is No Substitution

Published May 20, 2020

Email This Story

Fill out the form below to email this story to a friend


As lifelong residents of Madison who care deeply about the community and its history, we are deeply saddened to hear of the proposal by Adam Greenberg and Timothy Herbst to demolish the venerable General’s Residence.

In our three decades restoring historic properties, we have encountered every structural problem imaginable, and we emphatically believe no wood-framed building is ever truly beyond repair. Where there is a will, there is a way.

The charm of our community center is largely due to the diversity of its historic architecture. The General’s Residence has for centuries stood as a landmark on the east side of downtown, welcoming visitors and residents alike with its grand proportions and detailing. The building’s history as a residence to prominent citizens and most recently as a retail hub speaks to the flexibility and development potential of the property.

The Town of Madison has done a commendable job in safeguarding inappropriate development from turning Route 1 into the blighted commercial strips of the neighboring shoreline. However, the current proposal to tear down the existing historic structure in order to accommodate more units is completely out of line with previous efforts. A replica is no substitution for the real thing.

Smart development that reinvigorates historic properties benefits everyone. The proposal for the property at 908 Boston Post Road is not such an example. If there is one thing we have learned from making our business caring for historic properties, it is that short-sighted decisions have implications that last well beyond our lifetime.

We urge your readers to reach out to their elected officials and voice their disapproval of this proposal.

Peter Gulick
Travis Gulick