To make updates to your Zip06 account or requets changes to your newspaper delivery, please choose an option below.
If you have an account, please login! If you don't have an account, you can create one.
A Zip06 account will allow you to post to the online calendar, contribute to News From You, and interact with the Zip06 community. It's free to sign-up!Click here to get started!
We're happy you've decided to join the Zip06 community. Please fill out this short registration form to begin sharing content with your neighbors.
We can help! Enter the email address registered to your account below to have your password emailed to you.
Fill out the form below to email this story to a friend×
As chair of the Clinton Board of Education, I am compelled to refute the claim, made [by Michael Hughes] at the public hearing on April 10 and reported in the Harbor News [April 18 article “Finance Trims Clinton Budget Proposals, Sends to Referendum”], that the budget drafted and proposed by the board is “lining (our) pockets.”
First, by state statute, the board is charged to present a budget that properly funds the school district, a requirement met by this budget. Second, the increase in the operating budget is less than either the percentages mandated by contractual obligations or the rate of inflation. Third, the closing of Pierson will realize a savings, but we must continue to educate our 4th- and 5th-grade students, thereby continuing some of the cost of doing so.
Lastly, the board has behaved ethically, diligently, and prudently throughout the budgetary process; to suggest that there are any pockets to be lined is disrespectful of the hard work and dedication of its members.
Get ready to celebrate the holidays with our helpful guide