Love getting your local community news? Please consider supporting us with a monetary contribution through our Voluntary Pay Program.

Click here for more information

May 19, 2019  |  

Your Neighbors. Your News.

My Account

To make updates to your Zip06 account or requets changes to your newspaper delivery, please choose an option below.

Welcome to!

If you have an account, please login! If you don't have an account, you can create one.



A Zip06 account will allow you to post to the online calendar, contribute to News From You, and interact with the Zip06 community. It's free to sign-up!

Click here to get started!

Register for Zip06

We're happy you've decided to join the Zip06 community. Please fill out this short registration form to begin sharing content with your neighbors.

You must enter your first name.
You must enter your last name.
You must enter a username
You must enter a valid email address
Show password
You must enter a valid zip code

Submit to Zip06

Forget Your Password?

We can help! Enter the email address registered to your account below to have your password emailed to you.

Submit an Announcement

Their Real Goal

Published Feb. 13, 2019

Email This Story

Fill out the form below to email this story to a friend


Attending a Planning & Zoning Commission hearing last week, I spoke about the dangers of a change to I-2 zoning regulations to allow a sports complex. I am solidly in favor of this complex, so what’s the issue? The property owners proposing this change are the same ones who wanted to build a dirty recycling center on Route 145 at the old Unilever site. These owners have sued the town twice and may not hesitate to do so again. You should ask, what is their real goal here?

The owner’s statements about a possible sports complex on Route 145 sound good, but talk is cheap. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. I would like a sports complex here as much as anyone, but there is no way to guarantee this happens. Changing zoning regulations can certainly have unintended consequences. There is a counter opinion that it may be more dangerous to deny the owners’ request. The risk either way is that the owners may not have given up on their plan for a recycling center.

Within the confines of the zoning regulations, property owners can do what they want with their property, public pronouncements notwithstanding. You have to go no further than the new CVS to see an example. The question becomes, is this zoning proposal a clever ruse to facilitate legally changing this site back to a construction debris recycling center through what’s called a “special exception”?

Many parents, with young athletes, will want this complex built, as would I. There’s no way to divine the owner’s true intention. Hoping for an outcome will not make it happen. We must ask ourselves, why would a property owner give up the use of a valuable rail siding to build a sports complex with uncertain revenues?

Selectman Phil Sengle (R)

Love Local News?

Get it Delivered Right to Your Inbox!

Sign-Up for Weekly Newsletters!